Criticizing Language

Martin Hinton

Criticizing Language
Dangers, Deficiencies and Conceptual Engineering

Article

29/2 – Fall 2024, pages 255-276

Date of online publication: 23 décembre 2024

Date of publication: 23 décembre 2024

Abstract

In this paper, I consider a number of philosophical critiques of language and describe how their criticisms compare. In particular, I discuss how the current trend in the philosophy of language known as conceptual engineering fits into this tradition and to what extent it can be considered a critique of language per se, rather than a method of addressing dissatisfactions with certain individual terms. I suggest that criticisms can be divided allegations of two types of shortcoming: dangers and deficiencies. In the category of dangers, I consider some well-known examples from the history of philosophy, and suggest that they partly rely on an unexpressed from of Linguistic Determinism. I then move on to the deficiencies highlighted in the critiques offered by Wittgenstein in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, and Mauthner in his Contributions to a Critique of Language. These form a pair of apparently opposite ways of considering the flaws in language, but I shall argue that they have much in common. I then describe the conceptual engineering movement and its mission to provide ‘improved’ meanings of certain terms. I show that implicit in the assumptions behind conceptual engineering are criticisms of language of both varieties – current meanings are seen as dangerous as they represent a threat to social justice, and the system of allocation of meaning is seen as flawed and in need of external intervention.

Keywords

Cite this article

Hinton, Martin. 2024. "Criticizing Language: Dangers, Deficiencies, and Conceptual Engineering." Forum Philosophicum 29 (2): 255–76. doi:10.35765/forphil.2024.2902.02.

Bibliography

Berkeley, George. 1988. Principles of Human Knowledge. London: Penguin.
Bredeck, Elizabeth. 1990. “Crumbling Foundations: Fritz Mauthner and Philosophy after ‘Philosophy’.” Modern Austrian Literature 23 (2): 41–53.
Burgess-Jackson, Keith. 1995. “Rape and persuasive definition.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (3): 415–54
Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cappelen, Herman. 2020. “Conceptual Engineering: The Master Argument.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by H. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carrera de la Red, María José. 2008. “’Thought Words, Words Inane, Thought Inane’: Samuel Beckett’s Critique of Language in His Four Novellas.” In Proceedings of the 31st AEDEAN Conference, edited by Lorenzo Modia, 723–31. A Coruña: Universidade.
Dapia, Silvia G. 2006. “The Metaphor of Translation: Borges and Mauthner’s Critique of Language.” Variaciones Borges 21: 23–85.
Deutsch, Max. 2020. “Speaker’s Reference, Stipulation, and a Dilemma for Conceptual Engineers.” Philosophical Studies 177: 3935–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01416-z.
Haslanger, Sally. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Nous 34: 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00201.
Henne, Céline. 2024. “A Pragmatist Response to Deutsch’s Dilemma for Conceptual Engineers.” In Conceptual Engineering: Methodological and Metaphilosophical Issues, edited by Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Chapter 4. Leiden: Brill.
Hinton, Martin. 2021. Evaluating the Language of Argument. Cham: Springer.
Hinton, Martin. 2024. “Conceptual Engineering and the Philosophical Fallacies of Language.” Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10067-2
Hinton, Martin, and Fabrizio Macagno, eds. 2024. Arguing with Engineered Concepts. Special issue, Topoi.
Isaac, Manuel Gustavo. 2023. “Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?” Erkenntnis 88: 2145–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00447-0.
Jorem, Sigurd, and Guido Löhr. 2024. “Inferentialist Conceptual Engineering.” Inquiry 67 (3): 932–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2062045.
Kager, Maria. 2018. “James Joyce and Fritz Mauthner: Multilingual Liberators of Language.”The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 93 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00168890.2018.1396082.
Kienpointner, Manuel. 1996. “Whorf and Wittgenstein: Language, World View and Argumentation.” Argumentation 10: 475–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142980.
Koch, Steffen. 2021. “There Is No Dilemma for Conceptual Engineering: Reply to Max Deutsch.” Philosophical Studies 178: 2279–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01546-4.
Löhr, Guido. 2024. “What’s the Relation between Conceptual Ethics and Ethics? An Instrumentalist Defense of Conceptual Engineering.” In Conceptual Engineering: Methodological and Metaphilosophical Issues, edited by Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Chapter 8. Leiden: Brill.
Matsui, Takaaki. 2024. “Local Conceptual Engineering in a Linguistic Sub-Group and the Implementation Problem.” In Conceptual Engineering: Methodological and Metaphilosophical Issues, edited by Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Chapter 6. Leiden: Brill.
Mauthner, Fritz. 1901–1902. Beiträge zu einer Kritik der Sprache. Stuttgart: Cotta.
Naess, Arne. 1966. Communication and Argument. London: Allen and Unwin.
Nájera, Elena. 2014. “Wittgenstein versus Mauthner: Two Critiques of Language, Two Mysticism.” In From the ALWS Archives: A Selection of Papers from the International Wittgenstein Symposia in Kirchberg am Wechsel. Accessed November 3, 2024. https://wab.uib.no/ojs/index.php/agora-alws/article/viewFile/2659/3041.
Nelson, Leonard. 2016. A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies. Translated by F. Leal and D. Carus. Cham: Springer.
Oliver, William D. 1963. “Peirce on ‘The Ethics of Terminology’.” The Philosophical Quarterly 13 (52): 238–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2955490.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1958. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss (Volumes 1–6), and Arthur Burks (Volumes 7–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pruś, Jakub, and Andrew Aberdein. 2022. “Is Every Definition Persuasive? Douglas Walton on Persuasiveness of Definition.” Informal Logic 42 (1): 25–47. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i1.7211.
Schiappa, Edward. 2003. Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Schlick, Moritz. 1936. “Meaning and Verification.” The Philosophical Review 45: 339–69.
Schumann, Jennifer, Sandrine Zufferey, and Steve Oswald. 2021. “The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives.” Argumentation 35 (3): 361–88.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09540-0.
Seron, Denis. 2021. “Brentano and Mauthner on Grammatical Illusions.” In Philosophy of Language in the Brentano School, edited by A. Dewalque, C. Gauvry, and S. Richard. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shields, Matthew. 2021. “Conceptual Domination.” Synthese 199: 15043–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03454-4.
Shields, Matthew. 2023. “Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology 37 (4): 464–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2172696.
Skerl, Jennie. 1974. “Fritz Mauthner’s ‘Critique of Language’ in Samuel Beckett’s Watt.” Contemporary Literature 15 (4): 474–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1207773.
Stalmaszczyk, Piotr, ed. 2024. Conceptual Engineering: Methodological and Metaphilosophical Issues. Leiden: Brill.
Stevenson, Charles L. 1944. Ethics and language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2007. Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Visser, Jacky, Marcin Koszowy, Barbara Konat, Katarzyna Budzyńska, and Chris Reed. 2018. “Straw Man as Misuse of Rephrase.” In Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, vol. 2, edited by Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat, 555–74. London: College Publications.
Walton, Douglas. 2001. “Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments.” Argumentation and Advocacy 37 (3): 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2001.11951664.
Weiler, Gershon. 1958. “On Fritz Mauthner’s Critique of Language.” Mind 67 (265): 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXVII.265.80.
Weiler, Gershon. 1970. Mauthner’s Critique of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited by John B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. London: Routledge.
Wolff, Philip, and Kevin J. Holmes. 2011. “Linguistic Relativity.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2 (3): 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.104.

Copyright

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License