On the Need for Distinctive Christian Moral Psychologies

Jaeha Woo

On the Need for Distinctive Christian Moral Psychologies
How Kant Can Figure into Christian Ethics Today

Article

28/1 – Spring 2023, pages 149-179

Date of online publication: 22 juin 2023

Date of publication: 22 juin 2023

Abstract

I show how those with Kantian habits of mind—those committed to maintaining certain kinds of universality in ethics—can still get involved in the project of securing the distinctiveness of Christian ethics by highlighting parts of his moral philosophy that are amenable to this project. I first describe the interaction among James Gustafson, Stanley Hauerwas, and Samuel Wells surrounding the issue of the distinctiveness of Christian ethics, to explain why Kant is generally understood as the opponent of this project in this discourse. Then I lay out his discussions of how his moral argument for postulating divine existence can have beneficial moral-psychological results, and of how we can find moral satisfaction, the sense of pleasure in our moral strivings, as two elements in his moral philosophy that can be turned into a distinctively Christian ethics with revisions that should be allowed within the broad confines of Kantian moral philosophy. I also point out that his own answer to the question of moral satisfaction is already distinctively Christian, in that it is inspired by the Christian tenets of the imputation of righteousness and the assurance of salvation.

Keywords

Cite this article

Woo, Jaeha. 2023. "On the Need for Distinctive Christian Moral Psychologies: How Kant Can Figure into Christian Ethics Today." Forum Philosophicum 28 (1): 149–79. doi:10.35765/forphil.2023.2801.08

Bibliography

Chignell, Andrew. 2014. “Rational Hope, Possibility, and Divine Action.” In Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by Gordon E. Michalson, 98–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—. 2022. “Kant, Wood, and Moral Arguments.” Kantian Review 27 (1): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415421000716.

Gustafson, James M. 1975. Can Ethics be Christian? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

—. 1978. Protestant and Roman Catholic Ethics: Prospects for Rapprochement. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

—. 2001. “Preface: An Appreciative Interpretation.” In Christ and Culture, expand. ed., by H. Richard Niebuhr, xxi–xxxv. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.

Hauerwas, Stanley. 1983. The Peaceable Kingdom: A Primer in Christian Ethics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

—. 1997. “On Doctrine and Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Christian Doctrine, edited by Colin E. Gunton, 21–40. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hauerwas, Stanley, and Samuel Wells. 2011. “Why Christian Ethics Was Invented.” In The Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics, 2nd ed., edited by Stanley Hauerwas and Samuel Wells, 28–37. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kahn, Samuel. 2018. “Kant’s Post-1800 Disavowal of the Highest Good Argument for the Existence of God.” Kant Yearbook 10 (1): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2018-0004.

Kant, Immanuel. 1996a. Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.

—. 1996b. Religion and Rational Theology. Edited and translated by Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press.

—. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.

—. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Paul Guyer. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Katongole, Emmanuel. 2000. Beyond Universal Reason: The Relation between Religion and Ethics in the Work of Stanley Hauerwas. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Lindholm, Tore. 2002. “Ethical Justification of Universal Rights across Normative Divides.” In Universal Ethics: Perspectives and Proposals from Scandinavian Scholars, edited by Goran Bexell and Dan-Erik Andersson, 63–83. New York: Martinus Nijhoff.

Min, Anselm K. 2017. “Sin, Grace, and Human Responsibility: Reflections on Justification by Faith Alone in the Age of Globalization.” Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 59 (4): 572–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2017-0033.

Narveson, Jan. 1985. “The How and Why of Universalizability.” In Morality and Universality: Essays on Ethical Universalizability, edited by Nelson T. Potter and Mark Timmons, 3–44. Boston: D. Reidel.

Palmquist, Stephen R. 2015. “Kant’s Prudential Theory of Religion: The Necessity of Historical Faith for Moral Empowerment.” Con-Textos Kantianos 1 (June): 57–76. https://10.5281/zenodo.18505.

Pasternack, Lawrence. 2020. “On the Alleged Augustinianism in Kant’s Religion.” Kantian Review 25 (1): 103–24. https://doi:10.1017/S1369415419000487.

Tanner, Kathryn. 2010. Christ the Key. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, Stephen Edelston. 1950. An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Woo, Jaeha. 2023. “Examining a Late Development in Kant’s Conception of Our Moral Life: On the Interactions Among Perfectionism, Eschatology, and Contentment in Ethics.” TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v8i1.65623.

Wood, Allen W. 2020. Kant and Religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Copyright

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License