- Home »
- Issues »
- 28/1 – Spring 2023 »
- Articles »
Kim and the Pairing Problem for Dualism
In Defense of a Thomistic Dualist Substance Ontology of Agent Causation
Abstract
The philosophical history of metaphysics of mind can be narrowed into two problems: Mind and body causation and issues of the self or persons. Due to the rise of the scientific revolution the nature of mental states and its possessors has been reduced to brain and cognitive functioning or eliminated instead of the ontological basic substance of a soul. The other criticism of soul identity or substance dualism is the problem of mental causation. In The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism (2018), Jaegwon Kim argues against the intelligibility of Cartesian dualism and further extends that argument to any form of substance dualism by raising the question of mental causation or the traditional mind-body problem. His main attack comes from the essence of mind and the causal closure of the physical, together these provide an argument against the non-physical view of persons. The question, “can mental events cause physical events?” Is a problem for the dualist which he calls “the pairing problem.” Since causation requires a spatiotemporal relation between two bodies, and mind and body are distinct substances or properties, there’s no cause-and-effect pairing relation between minds and physical objects or bodies. Thus, according to Kim, the essence of an immaterial thinking substance, such as a soul, is unintelligible and should be rejected since it fails to answer the pairing problem. However, Kim has a misunderstanding of substance dualist views of the independent ontological status of a substantial self or soul. Further, Kim’s challenge does not take into account a causal powers ontology in which primitive is the free agentive causal subject. I’ll argue that a soul, though embodied, is a non-material primitive substance that has basic faculties to exemplify mental properties. One of the faculties of the soul is the instantiation of active agency. Further, the postulation of Gods existence, having a metaphysical internal structure and powers, is grounds for the existence of a soul with its own metaphysical, unified structure in which the dispositional properties of consciousness are located and exemplified. I conclude that mental causation is a coherent notion especially in light of the active powers of agent causation. Thus, Kim’s problem of mental causation becomes no problem at all.
Keywords
Cite this article
Hyde, Jason. 2023. "Kim and the Pairing Problem for Dualism: In Defense of a Thomistic Dualist Substance Ontology of Agent Causation." Forum Philosophicum 28 (1): 127–47. doi:10.35765/forphil.2023.2801.07
Bibliography
Bernard of Clairvaux. 1988. On Grace and Free Choice. Translated by Daniel O’ Donovan. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications. —. 2013. Sermons for Lent and the Easter Season. Translated by Irene Edmonds. Edited by Mark A. Scott. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications. Churchland, Patricia Smith. 1994. “Can Neurobiology Teach Us Anything about Consciousness?” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 67 (4): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3130741. Kenny, Anthony. 2000. Aquinas on Mind. London: Routledge. Kim, Jaegwon. 1998. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. —. 2005. Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. —. 2018. “Against Cartesian Dualism.” In The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism, edited by Jonathan J. Loose, Angus. J.L. Menuge and J.P. Moreland, 152–67. Oxford: Blackwell. Koons, Robert C. 2021. “The ontological and epistemological superiority of hylomorphism.” Synthese 198 (supplement issue 3): 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1295-6. Kretzmann, Norman. 1993. “Philosophy of Mind.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, edited by Norman Kretzmann and Eleonore Stump, 128–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Moreland, J.P., and Scott B. Rae. 2000. Body and Soul: Human Nature and the Crisis in Ethics. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. Reid, Thomas. 1969. Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Thomas Aquinas. 1964. “Summa Contra Gentiles.” In Medieval Philosophy, edited by Herman Shapiro. Translated by A.C. Pegis, 331–67. New York: Random House. Thomas Aquinas. 2017. Commentary on the Sentences, Book IV, 1–13 Latin-English Opera Omnia. Translated by Beth Mortensen. Aquinas Institute. Emmaus Academic. —. 1954. De Veritate. translated by Robert W. Schmidt, S.J. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.