The Metaphysical Problem for Theistic Evolution

Michał Chaberek

The Metaphysical Problem for Theistic Evolution
Accidental Change Does Not Generate Substantial Change

Article

26/1 – Spring 2021, pages 35-49

Date of online publication: 30 juin 2021

Date of publication: 30 juin 2021

Abstract

This paper focuses on one of the metaphysical problems for theistic evolution which is the problem of evolutionary transition from one specified substantial form to another. According to the evolutionary account, new substantial forms appear owing to accidental changes in previously existing substances. However, the accidental change may only lead to production of new accidents not entirely new distinct substantial forms. The solutions proposed by modern Thomists head in two directions: One is the reduction of the number of substantial forms (species); the other consists of diminishing substantial form altogether. Both proposals stray from classical metaphysics. The evolutionary account of the origin of species ultimately needs to challenge the real existence of species and leads to nominalism. As such it cannot be reconciled with classical metaphysics.

Keywords

Cite this article

Chaberek, Michał. “The Metaphysical Problem for Theistic Evolution: Accidental Change Does Not Generate Substantial Change.” Forum Philosophicum 26, no. 1 (2021): 35–49. doi:10.35765/forphil.2021.2601.04.

Bibliography

Adler, Mortimer Jerome. 1940. Problems for Thomists: The Problem of Species. New York: Sheed & Ward.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1951. “De Anima.” Translated by Kenelm Foster and Sylvester Humphries. Accessed 16 June 2020. https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/DeAnima.htm.
———. 1952. “De Potentia.” Translated by the English Dominican Fathers. Accessed 16 June 2020. https://isidore.co/aquinas/QDdePotentia3.htm.
———. 1955–7. “Summa contra Gentiles.” Translated by James F. Anderson. Accessed 16 June 2020. https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/ContraGentiles2.htm.
———. 1959. “De Substantiis Separatis.” Translated by Francis J. Lescoe. Accessed 16 June 2020. https://isidore.co/aquinas/SubstSepar.htm.
———. “Super Sententiis Petri Lombardii.” Accessed 16 June 2020. https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/snp2016.html.
Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2016.
Austriaco, Nicanor. 2018. “In Defense of Thomistic Evolution: A Response to Chaberek.” Accessed 16 June 2020. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2018/03/20975/.
Behe, Michael. 2006. Darwin’s Black Box. New York: Free Press.
———. 2008. The Edge of Evolution. New York: Free Press.
———. 2019a. Darwin Devolves: The New Science about DNA That Challenges Evolution. New York: HarperOne.
Chaberek, Michał. 2019a. Aquinas and Evolution. 2nd ed. Southwestern British Columbia: The Chartwell Press.
———. 2019b. “Classical Metaphysics and Theistic Evolution: Why are They Incompatible?” Studia Gilsoniana 8 (1): 47–81. https://doi.org/10.26385/SG.080102.
De Koninck, Charles. 2008. “The Cosmos. The Philosophic Point of View.” In The Writings of Charles De Koninck, edited and translated by Ralph McInerny. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Denton, Michael. 2016. Evolution: Still a Theory in Crisis. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press.
Feser, Edward. 2014. Scholastic Metaphysics. Piscataway, NY: Transaction Books.
Fifth Lateran Council. 1512–7. https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum18.htm
Francis, Pope. 2013. “Evangelium Gaudii.” Accessed 16 June 2020. http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html.
ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System). 2020, “Hierarchical Report.” Accessed 5 May 2020.https://www.itis.gov/hierarchy.html.
John Paul II. 1996. “Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences.” Accessed 07 October 2020. http://www.casinapioiv.va/content/accademia/en/magisterium/johnpaulii/22october1996.html.
Leo XIII. 1893. “Providentissimus Deus.” Accessed 7 October 2020. https://w2.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_18111893_providentissimus-deus.html.
Luyten, Norbert. 1951. “Philosophical Implications of Evolution.” New Scholasticism 25: 290–312.
Maritain, Jacques. 1977. “Toward a Thomist Idea of Evolution.” In Untrammeled Approaches. The Collected Works of Jacques Maritain, 85–131. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Meyer, Stephen C. 2010. Signature in the Cell. New York: HarperOne.
Murray, Andrew W. 2020. “Can Gene-Inactivating Mutations Lead to Evolutionary Novelty?” Current Biology 30 (10): 465–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.072.
Reale, Giovanni. 1975. Storia della filosofia antica. Vol. 2. Mediolan: Vita e Pensiero.
Ryan, Fáinche. 2009. “Aquinas and Darwin.” In Darwin and Catholicism, edited by Louis Caruana, 43–59. New York: T&T Clark.
Wells, Jonathan. 2000. Icons of Evolution. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.

Copyright

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License