- Home »
- Issues »
- 13/1 - Spring 2008 »
- Articles »
The Strong Version of Underdetermination of Theories by Empirical Data.
Comments on Wolenski's Analysis
Abstract
The Polish researcher in the field of logic and philosophy, Jan Woleński, in one of his recent articles, “Metalogical Observations About the Underdetermination of Theories by Empirical Data,” logically formalized two weak and strong versions of the underdetermination of theories by empirical data (or UT by abbreviation) and with these formalization has metalogically analyzed these two versions. Finally he has deducted that the weak version is defensible while the strong version is not. In this paper we will critically study Woleński's analysis of the strong version of UT.
Keywords
Cite this article
Taqavi, Mostafa, Zarepour, Mohammad Saleh. “The Strong Version of Underdetermination of Theories by Empirical Data. Comments on Wolenski's Analysis.” Forum Philosophicum 13, no. 1 (2008): 111–7. doi:10.35765/forphil.2008.1301.08.
Bibliography
Devitt, Michael. “Scientific Realism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, edited by Frank Jackson and Michael Smith, 767–791. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dalen, Dirk van. Logic and Structure. Berlin; New York: Springer, 1997. Hanson, Norwood Russell, 1958, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958. Hesse, Mary. “The Hunt for Scientific Reason.” PSA: Proceedings of Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, No. 1980, Volume Tow: Symposia and Invited Papers, (1980): 3–22. Jackson, Frank, and Michael Smith, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961. Woleński, Jan. “Metalogical Observations about Underdetermination of Theories by Empirical Data.” Reports on Philosophy 21 (2003): 173–178.