The Ontology of Natural Language(s) and Linguistic Relativity

Carlota García Llorente

The Ontology of Natural Language(s) and Linguistic Relativity
A Deflationary Approach

Article

29/2 – Fall 2024, pages 293-315

Date of online publication: 23 décembre 2024

Date of publication: 23 décembre 2024

Abstract

Despite the fact that natural language has always been one of the most important resources for the study of ontology, many authors continue to regard it as a deceptive guide to the inquiry into what there is. The notion of natural language as a trap is carried over into contemporary metaontological studies, which typically reject natural language as ontologically committing. From a deflationary perspective, this paper aims to argue that ontological commitment occurs in natural languages, with implications for the linguistic relativity hypothesis. To this end, a view based on naturalized epistemology and other aspects of Quine’s philosophy is presented. The perspective of Natural Language Ontology proposed by Moltmann is also introduced, with the goal of offering a new approach that allows a specific analysis of the ontological commitments of natural languages. While Moltmann herself indicates some motivations for this, its potential attractiveness for the study of linguistic relativity will be emphasized here. Finally, it will be suggested that there may be a linguistic bias around the proposed criteria of ontological commitment.

Keywords

Cite this article

Llorente, Carlota García. 2024. "The Ontology of Natural Language(s) and Linguistic Relativity: A Deflationary Approach." Forum Philosophicum 29 (2): 293–315. doi:10.35765/forphil.2024.2902.04.

Bibliography

Aristotle. 2010. “On Interpretation.” In Translations From The Organon Of Aristotle, edited and translated by Walter Smith and Alan G. Gibson. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.

Blanco Salgueiro, Antonio. 2017. La Relatividad Lingüística: (Variaciones Filosóficas). Madrid: Akal.

Bricker, Phillip. 2016. “Ontological Commitment.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ontological-commitment.

Chomsky, Noam. 1969. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

—. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.

—. 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.

Creamer, M. H. 1974. “Noun Ranking in Navajo.” The Navajo Language Review 1 (1).

Davidson, Donald. 2001. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” In Essays on Actions and Events, 105–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Duranti, Alessandro. 2023. “If It Is Language That Speaks, What Do Speakers Do? Confronting Heidegger’s Language Ontology.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 33 (3): 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12404.

Fine, Kit. 2017. “Naive Metaphysics.” Philosophical Issues 27 (1): 98–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12092.

Fogelin, Robert. 2004. “Aspects of Quine’s Naturalized Epistemology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Quine, edited by Roger F. Gibson, 19–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gil, David. 2013. “Riau Indonesian: A Language without Nouns and Verbs.” In Flexible Word Classes, edited by Jan Rijkhoff and Eva Van Lier, 89–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0004.

Hale, Bob, and Crispin Wright. 2003. The Reason’s Proper Study: Essays towards a Neo-Fregean Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

—. 2009. “The Metaontology of Abstraction.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by David Chalmers, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, 178–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hale, Kenneth, Eloise Jelinek, and Mary Ann Willie. 2003. “Topic and Focus Scope Positions in Navajo.” In Word Order and Scrambling, 1–21. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758403.ch1.

Hofweber, Thomas. 2005. “A Puzzle about Ontology.” Nous 39 (2): 256–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0029-4624.2005.00501.X.

Hylton, Peter. 2007. Quine. London: Routledge.

Inwagen, Peter Van. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501713033.

Leavitt, John. 2010. Linguistic Relativities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975059.

Matthewson, Lisa. 2006. “Temporal Semantics in a Superficially Tenseless Language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (6): 673–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9010-6.

Moltmann, Friederike. 2017. “Natural Language Ontology.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.330.

—. 2020. “Natural Language Ontology.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics, edited by Ricki Bliss and J.T.M. Miller, 325–38. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315112596-25.

—. 2022. “Natural Language Ontology.” In Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/natural-language-ontolgy.

O’Neill, Sean. 2019. “Linguistic Relativity in the Age of Ontology: How Language Shapes Worldview and Ways of Being, Even Going Beyond the Human.” In Languages—Cultures—Worldviews, 19–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28509-8_2.

Pānini. 1898. The Ashtadhyayi of Panini Translated into English. Edited and translated by Srisa Chandra Vasu. Vol. I–VIII. Sindhu charan bose.

Copyright

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License