Cezary ZalewskiCorresponding authorORCID id

From “catharsis in the text” to “catharsis of the text”
“A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics” by Roman Ingarden in the (critical) light of mimetic theory

25/2 – Autumn 2020, pages 323-339
Date of online publication: 04 December 2020
Date of publication: 04 December 2020


Roman Ingarden (1893–1970) was a prominent Polish philosopher, phenomenologist, and student of Edmund Husserl. A characteristic feature of his works was the almost complete absence of analyzes from the history of philosophy. That is why it is so surprising that right after the end of World War II, the first text analyzed when Ingarden started working at the Jagiellonian University was Aristotle’s “Poetics.” Ingarden published the results of his research in Polish in 1948 in “Kwartalnik Filozoficzny” and in the early 1960s his essay was translated and published in the renowned American magazine “The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism” as “A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics.”

As far as I know today, this text does not arouse much interest among the many commentators and followers of Ingarden’s philosophy. Perhaps this state of affairs is justified: Ingarden’s own ideas are only repeated here, and their usefulness in the meaning of “Poetics” remains far from obvious. However, I think that this relative obscurity is worth considering now, because it shows how modern reason tries to control ancient concepts. The main purpose of this article is therefore to recon- struct the strategy by which philosophy tames the text of “Poetics,” especially its concepts such as catharsis and mimesis. The discovery and presentation of these treatments would not have been possible were it not for the mimetic theory of René Girad, which provides anthropological foundations for a critique of philosophical discourse.


Cite this article

Zalewski, Cezary. “From 'catharsis in the text' to 'catharsis of the text': 'A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics' by Roman Ingarden in the (critical) light of mimetic theory.” Forum Philosophicum 25, no. 2 (2020): 323–39. doi:10.35765/forphil.2020.2502.21.


Aristotle. 1902. The Poetics of Aristotle. Translated by Samuel Henry Butcher. London:

Macmillan and Company.
Bandera, Cesareo. 1994. The Sacred Game. The Role of the Sacred in the Genesis of Modern

Literary Fiction. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
Copleston, Frederic. 1962. History of philosophy. Vol. 1: Greece and Rome. New York: Crown

Publishing Group.
Doran, Robert, and René Girard. 2008. “Apocalyptic Thinking after 9/11: An Interview with

René Girard.” SubStance 37 (1): 20–32.
Girard, René. 1987. Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World. Translated by Stephen

Bann and Michael Metteer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
— . 1988. “To Double Business Bound”: Essays on Literature, Mimesis, and Anthropology.

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
— . 1995. “Einheit von Ethik und Ästhetik im Ritual.” In Ethik der Ästhetik, edited by Christop

Wulf, Dietmar Kamper and Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, 69–75. Berlin: De Gruyter.
— . 2000. A Theatre of Envy. Leominster: Gracewing.
— . 2002. “Psychoanalysis and Mimetic Theory: Difference and Identity. A Conversation

with Sergio Benvenuto in collaboration with Maurizio Meloni.” Journal of European

Psychoanalysis 14: 3–25.
— . 2005. Violence and the Sacred. Translated by Patrick Gregory. Baltimore: John Hopkins

University Press.
Hussain, Martha. 2001. Ontology and the Art of Tragedy: An Approach to Aristotle’s Poetics.

New York: Suny Press.
Ingarden, Roman. 1961. “A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics.” The Journal of

Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (2): 163–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/427465.
— . 1962. “A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics. Part II.” The Journal of Aesthetics

and Art Criticism 20 (3): 273–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/427325.
— . 1973a. The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. Translated by Ruth Ann Crowley and

Kenneth R. Olson. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
— . 1973b. The Literary Work of Art. Translated by George G. Grabowicz. Evanston, IL:

Northwestern University Press.
— . 1985. Selected Papers in Aesthetics. edited by Peter J. McCormick. Munich: Philosophia

— . 2013. The Controversy over the Existence of the World. Translated by Arthur Szylewicz.

Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
McKenna, Andrew J. 1998. “Aristotle’s Theater of Envy: Paradox, Logic, and Literature.”

In Philosophical Designs for a Socio-Cultural Transformation. Beyond Violence and Modern

Era, edited by Tetsuji Yamamoto, 632–54. Tokyo: Rowman and Littlefield.
Potts, J. Leonard. 1953. Aristotle on the Art of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.