- Home »
- Issues »
- 14/2 - Fall 2009 »
- Articles »
Reference, Description, and Explanation. Where Metaphysics Went Wrong?
Abstract
The classical arguments against metaphysics provided by Immanuel Kant, neopositivists and recently by analytical philosophers focus on the problem of meaning. In my paper I would like to shed a little bit of light on different dimensions of this problem in the metaphysical discourse and make a proposition how to overcome the difficulties that arise from this kind of discourse.
Keywords
Cite this article
Kołodziejczyk, Sebastian Tomasz. “Reference, Description, and Explanation: Where Metaphysics Went Wrong?” Forum Philosophicum 14, no. 2 (2009): 175–91. doi:10.35765/forphil.2009.1402.16.
Bibliography
Aristotle. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. A revised text with introduction and commentary by W. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1924. Aristotle. Aristotle’s Categories and De interpretatione. Translated with notes by J. L. Ackrill. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1966. Ayer, J. A. Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Dover Publications, 1953. Dummett, Michael Anthony Eardley. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991. Gilson, Étienne. Being and Some Philosophers. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1952. Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Tom Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 2000. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965. Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Alexander Campbell Fraser with Introduction by Walter R. Ott. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 2004. Łukasiewicz, Jan. O zasadzie sprzeczności u Arystotlesa. Studyum Krytyczne. Kraków: Akademia Umiejętności, 1910. Plantinga, Alvin. Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. Strawson, P. F. Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen, 1959.