- Home »
- Issues »
- 29/2 – Fall 2024 »
- Articles on other subjects »
Hope Beyond Human
A Philosophy of Hope in the Digital Age
Abstract
Hope is a complex notion currently attracting a notable degree of scholarly and public attention. In particular, technological and scientific progress is frequently viewed as located somewhere on a continuum between hope and despair. Considering the many ways in which technology and hope are interlinked, in the present article I propose to look at how the latter should be understood in the digital age. In the first part of the analysis, the definition of hope will be discussed. To draw valid conclusions, notions like utopia and optimism will also be taken into account. In the second part, I consider whether the digital space should be thought of as an environment providing conditions for the enhancement of hope—or, rather, for its reduction. In the third part, the notion of “hoping beyond the human” is analyzed in relation to the debate over “sentient” machines and the psychological changes humans undergo in digital spaces. The article is meant to serve as an addition to current publications on hope, given that the focus of the latter is usually on debates surrounding humanism and/or political power. It also aims to demonstrate the necessity of paying critical attention to hope itself within the context of an understanding of technological progress.
Keywords
Cite this article
Bugajska, Anna. 2024. "Hoping Beyond the Human: A Philosophy of Hope in the Digital Age." Forum Philosophicum 29 (2): 351–69. doi:10.35765/forphil.2024.2902.07.
Bibliography
Bakewell, Sarah. 2023. Humanly Possible: Seven Hundred Years of Humanist Freethinking, Inquiry, and Hope. New York: Penguin Press. Bloeser, Claudia, and Titus Stahl. 2022. “Hope.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/hope/. Costello, Stephen J. 2020. Beyond Hope. Philosophical Reflections. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Doná, Giorgia. 2015. “Making Homes in Limbo: Embodied Virtual ‘Homes’ in Prolonged Conditions of Displacement.” Refuge 31 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40298. Farrell, Bernadette, María Carolina Nieto Ángel, and Mônica Maciel Vahl. 2018. “Hope and Utopia in Post-truth Times: A Freirean Approach / Esperança e Utopia em Tempos de Pós-Verdade: Uma Abordagem Freireana.” Revista Brasileira de Alfabetização 1 (6). https://doi.org/10.47249/rba.2017.v1.225. Godfrey, Joseph J. 1987. A Philosophy of Human Hope. Dodrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. Harris, Mark. 2017. “Inside the First Church of Artificial Intelligence.” Wired. Accessed October 16, 2024. https://www.wired.com/story/anthony-levandowski-artificial-intelligence-religion/. Herz, Marcus, Philip Lalander, and Torun Elsrud. 2022. “Governing through Hope: An Exploration of Hope and Social Change in an Asylum Context.” Emotions and Society 4 (2): 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1332/263169021X16528637795399. Hillis, Ken. 1999. Digital Sensations. Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Kind, Amy. 2016. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. New York: Routledge. Labatut, Benjamín. 2020. When We Cease to Understand the World. London: Pushkin Press. Luscombe, Richard. 2022. “Google Engineer Put on Leave After Saying AI Chatbot Has Become Sentient.” The Guardian, June 12. Accessed October 16, 2024. https://www.the-guardian.com/technology/2022/jun/12/google-engineer-ai-bot-sentient-blake-lemoine. Marcel, Gabriel. (1952) 2010. Homo Viator: Introduction to the Metaphysics of Hope. Translated by L. E. Craufurd and P. Seaton. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press. Pilsch, Andrew. 2017. Transhumanism. Evolutionary Futurism and the Human Technologies of Utopia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Rendueles, César. 2017. Sociophobia: Political Change in the Digital Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press. Rubio, Isabel. 2021. “Lucas es cariñoso y atento, pero no es humano: así fue el mes que pasé junto a una inteligencia artificial.” El País, March 2. Accessed October 16, 2024. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2021-03-01/eres-mi-osito-de-peluche-y-el-de-nadie-mas-un-mes-saliendo-con-una-inteligencia-artificial.html. Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. 1969. Letters from a Stoic. Translated by R. Campbell. London: Penguin. Shaviro, Steven. 2014. The Universe of Things: on Speculative Realism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Sisto, Davide. 2022. Porcospini digitali. Vivere e mai morire online. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri. Solnit, Rebecca. 2004. Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities. Chicago: Haymarket Books. Soniewicka, Marta. 2022. “The Politics of Hope: Utopia as an Exercise in Social Imagination.” In Utopian Thinking in Law, Politics, Architecture and Technology, edited by Bart van Klink, Marta Soniewicka, and Leon van den Broeke, 96–115. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Twigt, Mirjam A. 2018. “The Mediation of Hope: Digital Technologies and Affective Affordances Within Iraqi Refugee Households in Jordan.” Social Media + Society, 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764426. Vincent, Jane, and Leopoldina Fortunati. 2009. Electronic Emotion: The Mediation of Emotion via Information and Communication Technologies. Bern: Peter Lang. Watkins, Elizabeth Anne. 2014. “Towards a Theory of HyperHistory: From the Here and Now to the Everywhere and Forever.” The Enemy 1. http://theenemyreader.org/towards-a-theory-of-hyperhistory/. Weisman, Andrew. 2007. The World Without Us. New York: St Martin’s Press. Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019a. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile. Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019b. “‘We Make Them Dance’: Surveillance Capitalism, the Rise of Instrumentarian Power, and the Threat to Human Rights.” In Human Rights in the Age of Platforms, edited by Rikke Frank Jørgensen, 3–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Zwart, Hub. 2017. “‘Extimate’ Technologies and Techno-Cultural Discontent: A Lacanian Analysis of Pervasive Gadgets.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (1): 24–55. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20174560.