Alicja PietrasCorresponding authorORCID id

Hans Wagner’s Transcendental Argument for the Idea of Human Dignity

Article
27/2 – Fall 2022, pages 261-272
Date of online publication: 27 décembre 2022
Date of publication: 27 décembre 2022

Abstract

Hans Wagner (1917–2000), using the achievements of German transcendental philosophy, gives a transcendental argument for the idea of human dignity. He claims that to ground the validity of human thinking and all its products (e.g. culture), we must accept the validity of the idea of human dignity. The structure of my paper is as follows: First, I consider what it means to give a transcendental justification of something. I reconstruct the neo-Kantian’s understanding of transcendental method. Then I argue that Wagner’s idea of human dignity as a foundation of every ethics and law is nothing other than a fruitful interpretation and continuation, perhaps only making explicit Kant’s main ethical ideas. To make this more clear I present the relation between Kant’s ethics and the material ethics of values and, following Wagner, I argue that grounding ethics on the idea of self-determination of human will does not necessarily lead to formalism in the form in which it was criticised by the representatives of the material ethics of values. Finally, I reconstruct Wagner’s argument for the claim that the idea of human dignity is a transcendental condition for the possibility of ethics and law in general.

Keywords

Cite this article

Pietras, Alicja. 2022. "Hans Wagner’s Transcendental Argument for the Idea of Human Dignity." Forum Philosophicum 27 no. 2 (2022): 261–272. doi:10.35765/forphil.2022.2702.15.

Bibliography

Berger, Peter Ludwig, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.

Brelage, Martin. 1965. Studien zur Transzendentalphilosophie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Grünewald, Bernward. 2006. “Hans Wagner – Prinzipientheorie und Menschenwürde.” Wiener Jahrbuch für Philosophie 38: 175–85.

Hartmann, Nicolai. 1912. “Systematische Methode.” Logos. Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie der Kultur 3 (2): 121–63.

—. 1926. Ethik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

—. 1949. Das Problem des geistigen Seins. Untersuchung zur Grundlegung der Geschichtsphilosophie und der Geisteswissenschaften. 2 ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

—. 1953. New Ways of Ontology. Translated by Reinhard C. Kuhn. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

Kant, Immaunel. 1997. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (abbreviated as: KrV).

—. 1999. Practical Philosophy. edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (abbreviated as: GMS).

Krijnen, Christian, and Kurt. W. Zeidler, eds. 2017. Reflexion und konkrete Subjektivität. Beiträge zum 100. Geburtstag von Hans Wagner (1917–2000). Wien: Ferstl & Perz.

Lask, Emil. 1905. Separatabdruck aus: Die Philosophie im Beginn des 20. Jahrhundersts. Festschrift für Kuno Fischer. Vol. 2, Rechtsphilosophie. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.

Ollig, Hans Ludwig. 1979. Der Neukantianismus. Stuttgart: Metzler.

Pietras, Alicja. 2018. “Hans Wagner jako neoneokantysta.” Folia Philosophica 39: 5–26.

—. 2021. “Nicolai Hartmann and the Transcendental Method.” Logic and Logical Philosophy 30 (3): 461–92. https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2021.001.

Scheler, Max. 1916. Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines ethischen Personalismus. Halle: Max Nemeyer.

Wagner, Hans. 1959. Philosophie und Reflexion. Munich: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.

—. 1992. Die Würde des Menschen. Wesen und Normfunktion. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

Copyright

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License