' href="index.html?page=backend&format=rss&ident=654" />

Paul FavrauxCorresponding author

La pertinence de l'ontologie pour la théologie

[The Relevance of Ontology to Theology]

16/1 - Spring 2011, pages 47-57
Date of online publication: 24 March 2011
Date of publication: 24 March 2011


Ontology is still relevant for the reception of Christian revelation. Transcendental subjectivity, whose main role is to constitute, calls out for a deeper foundation. It is this deeper foundation that supplies an ontology of participation of all beings in Being and in God, as found in St Thomas and in some interpretations of his work (those of E. Gilson, A. Chapelle, A. Léonard). God's immanence in humanity and in creation, and human participation in Being and ultimately in God, enable us to conceive of a causal action upon the whole of humanity and upon the whole of creation, a causal action issuing from the death-resurrection of Christ. In the context of contemporary philosophy, marked too unilaterally by finitude and historicity, this ontology needs to be supplemented by an anthropological reflection on liberty—liberty donated to itself (C. Bruaire) rather than liberty uniquely devoted to an indefinite search of itself. This is the main point behind A. Chapelle's anthropology. Moreover, it is this sense of liberty that underlies at the same time a genuine pathway to ethics.


Cite this article

Favraux, Paul. “La pertinence de l'ontologie pour la théologie.” Forum Philosophicum 16, no. 1 (2011): 47–57. doi:10.35765/forphil.2011.1601.04.


Bruaire, Claude. L’être et l’esprit. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1983.

Chapelle, Albert. Anthropologie. Bruxelles: Lessius, 2007.

Chapelle, Albert. Séminaire “L’homme et le salut.” Bruxelles: polycopié de l’IET, 1970.

Gilson, Etienne. Le thomisme, introduction à la philosophie de saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Vrin, 1989.

Léonard, André. Métaphysique de l'être: essai de philosophie fondamentale. Paris: Cerf, 2006.

Piret, Pierre. L’affirmation de Dieu dans la tradition philosophique. Bruxelles: Lessius, 1998.


© Forum Philosophicum