Berkeley, Expressivism, and Pragmatism
Abstract
There is a long‑standing dispute among scholars concerning Berkeley’s supposed commitment to an emotivist theory of meaning as the very first (and an early modern) instance of non‑cognitivism. According to this position, the domains of religious and moral language do not refer to facts about the world, but rather express the emotional attitudes of religious or moral language users. Some scholars involved in the dispute argue for taking Berkeley to be an emotivist (non‑cognitivist), while others hold that we should not do so. This paper puts forward an interpretation that lends support to the non‑cognitivist reading of his stance, but in expressivist rather than emotivist terms. It argues that the label “expressivism” does more justice to the textual evidence concerning his understanding of moral language, as what is distinctive where this philosopher is concerned is his interest in explaining the nature of our practice of employing moral language (i.e. how we come to formulate moral statements as expressions of our non‑referential attitudes, and the meta‑level considerations pertaining to morality associated with this), rather than whether morality is just a matter of our emotions or feelings (i.e. such first‑order considerations about morality as whether moral rightness and wrongness correspond merely to our emotional states).
Keywords
Cite this article
Szałek, Piotr K. “Berkeley, Expressivism, and Pragmatism.” Forum Philosophicum 24, no. 2 (2019): 435-56. doi:10.35765/forphil.2019.2402.18.
Bibliography
Ayer, Alfred J. Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover Publications, 1952. Belfrage, Bertil. “Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).” History of European Ideas 7, no. 6 (1986): 643–649. doi:10.1016/0191-6599(86)90014-8. ———. “The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 117–126. ———. “Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger 176, no. 3 (1986): 319–330. ———. “Editor’s Commentary.” In George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction, edited by Bertil Belfrage, 25–57. Oxford: Doxa, 1987. ———. “The Mystery of Goodness in Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley, edited by Bertil Belfrage and Richard Brook, 141–157. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. ———. “The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707‑1708).” Acta Philosophica Fennica 83 (2007): 37–52. Berkeley, George. “Alciphron; or the Minute Philosopher.” In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, edited by Arthur A. Luce and Thomas E. Jessop. Vol. 3, London: Nelson, 1950. ———. “De Motu.” In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, edited by Arthur A. Luce and Thomas E. Jessop. Vol. 4, London: Nelson, 1951. ———. “An Essay toward a New Theory of Vision.” In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, edited by Arthur A. Luce and Thomas E. Jessop. Vol. 1, London: Nelson, 1948. ———. George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. Edited by Bertil Belfrage. Oxford: Doxa, 1987. ———. “Passive Obedience.” In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, edited by Arthur A. Luce and Thomas E. Jessop. Vol. 6, London: Nelson, 1953. ———. “Philosophical Commentaries.” In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, edited by Arthur A. Luce and Thomas E. Jessop. Vol. 1, London: Nelson, 1948. ———. “Siris: A Chain of Philosophical Reflexions and Inquiries Concerning the Virtues of Tar‑Water, and Divers Other Subjects Connected Together and Arising One from Another.” In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, edited by Arthur A. Luce and Thomas E. Jessop. Vol. 5, London: Nelson, 1953. Berman, David. “Berkeley’s Semantic Revolution: 19 November 1707–11 January 1708.” History of European Ideas 7, no. 6 (1986): 603–607. doi:10.1016/0191-6599(86)90009-4. ———. “Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy: Archaeology, Culture, History, Literature 81C (1981): 219–229. ———. George Berkeley. Idealism and the Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994. Blackburn, Simon. Essays in Quasi‑Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. ———. “The Steps from Doing to Saying.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110, no. 1 (2010): 1–13. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2010.00276.x. Brandom, Robert. Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Brykman, Geneviève. Berkeley Et Le Voile Des Mots. Paris: Vrin, 1993. ———. Berkeley: Philosophie Et Apologétique. Paris: Vrin, 1984. Carnap, Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology.” In Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, edited by Rudolf Carnap, 205–221. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956. Gibbard, Allan. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. Grzeliński, Adam. “Alciphron; or the Minute Philosopher: Berkeley’s Redefinition of Free‑Thinking.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley, edited by Bertil Belfrage and Richard Brook, 174–195. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. Jakapi, Roomet. “Berkeley’s Defence of the Scripture in Alciphron Vi.” In Berkeley’s Alciphron: English Text and Essays in Interpretation, edited by Laurent Jaffro, Genevieve Brykman and Claire Schwartz, 353–356. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 2010. ———. “Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non‑Cognitivism.” In Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy, edited by Stephen H. Daniel, 188–198. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. ———. “Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10, no. 3 (2002): 401–411. doi:10.1080/09608780210143218. ———. “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘Non‑Cognitive’ Propositions in Scripture.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85, no. 1 (2003): 86–90. doi:10.1515/agph.2003.004. Kail, Peter J. E. “Berkeley, the Ends of Language, and the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (2007): 265–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00221.x. Locke, John. Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. McKim, Robert. “The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: A Reply to Bertil Belfrage.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 156–161. Olscamp, Paul J. The Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970. Pearce, Kenneth L. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Religion.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley, edited by Bertil Belfrage and Richard Brook, 458–483. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. ———. Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Roberts, John Russell. “Berkeley on the Philosophy of Language.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley, edited by Bertil Belfrage and Richard Brook, 421–434. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. ———. A Metaphysics for the Mob. The Philosophy of George Berkeley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Stevenson, Charles L. Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1944. Stewart, M. A. “Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1986–90): 10–19. Williford, Kenneth. “Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11, no. 2 (2003): 271–301. doi:10.1080/09608780320001047877.
Copyright
Issues
- Latest Issue
- Archive
- Forthcoming Issues
-
Select Issue
About the Journal
Information
Forum Philosophicum