Dino Galetti

Finding a Systematic Base for Derrida’s Work

Article
15/2 - Fall 2010, pages 275–300
Date of online publication: 20 December 2010
Date of publication: 20 December 2010

Abstract

Derrida became increasingly overt in later years in suggesting that his work displays a rigour, and even a “logic.” Further, it is becoming accepted that deconstruction arose in dialogue with Husserl. In support of these views, this article points out that in 1990 Derrida told us that his first work of 1954 revealsa “law” which guides his career, and that some responses had already arisen there. The work of 1954 is examined, and an interrelated “system” developed by which the responses relate to the law, to help find a common, early and systematic base to apply to Derrida’s oeuvre as it develops. Brief examples will be pointed to in closing to show that this basis subsists, at least in part, in later work.

Keywords

Cite this article

Galetti, Dino. “Finding a Systematic Base for Derrida’s Work.” Forum Philosophicum 15, no. 2 (2010): 275–300. doi:10.5840/forphil20101522.

Bibliography

Bennington, Geoffrey. “Derrida and Politics.” In Jacques Derrida and the Humanities: A Critical Reader, edited by Tom Cohen, 193–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511483134.011.

Bernet, Rudolf, Iso Kern, and Eduard Marbach. An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993.

Caputo, John D. “Derrida, a Kind of Philosopher: A Discussion of Recent Literature.” Research in Phenomenology 17, no. 1 (1987): 245–259. doi:10.1163/156916487X00139.

Cohen, Tom, ed. Jacques Derrida and the Humanities: A Critical Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511483134.

Derrida, Jacques. La Voix et Le Phénomène. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1967.

Derrida, Jacques. Edmund Husserl’s Origin of Geometry: an Introduction. Translated by John P. Leavey Jr. Edited by David B. Allison. Sussex, NY: Harvester Press, 1978.

Derrida, Jacques. Speech and Phenomena: And Other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs. Translated by David B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.

Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference. Translated by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.

Derrida, Jacques. The Archeology of the Frivolous: Reading Condillac. Translated by John P. Leavey Jr. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1987.

Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge, 1994.

Derrida, Jacques. Aporias. Translated by Thomas Dutoit. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.

Derrida, Jacques. The Problem of Genesis in Husserl's Philosophy. Translated by Martin Hobson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Galetti, Dino. “Looking for a Logic in Derrida: Assessing Hurst's ‘Plural Logic of the Aporia.’” Journal of Literary Studies 26, no. 3 (2010): 84–109. doi:10.1080/02564718.2010.495502.

Hart, Kevin. “Without Derrida.” The European Legacy 12, no. 4 (2007): 419–429. doi:10.1080/10848770701396205.

Hillis Miller, J. “Derrida and Literature.” In Jacques Derrida and the Humanities: A Critical Reader, edited by Tom Cohen, 58–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511483134.005.

Hobson Marian “The Logic of Representation (and the Representation of Logic).” Parallax 10, no. 3 (2004): 53–69. doi:10.1080/1353464042000226071.

Hurst, Andrea. “Derrida’s Quasi-Transcendental Thinking.” South African Journal of Philosophy 23. no. 3 (2004): 244–266. doi:10.4314/sajpem.v23i3.31396.

Hurst, Andrea. Derrida Vis-À-Vis Lacan Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.

Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations. 2 vols. Edited by Dermot Moran. Translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge, 2002.

Husserl, Edmund. Experience and Judgment. Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. Edited by Ludwig Landgrebe. Translated by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by William Ralph Boyce Gibson. London: Allen and Unwin, 1952.

Husserl, Edmund. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness. Edited by Martin Heidegger. Translated by James S. Churchill. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964.

Husserl, Edmund. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1960.

Husserl, Edmund. The Idea of Phenomenology. Translated by William P. Alston and George Nakhnikian. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1964.

Husserl, Edmund. Formal and Transcendental Logic. Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1969.

Kamei, Daisuke. “The Problem of the ‘Idea’ in Derrida’s: The Problem of Genesis.” In Logos of Phenomenology and Phenomenology of the Logos. Book One: Phenomenology As the Critique of Reason in Contemporary Criticism and Interpretation, edited by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, 339–353. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3680-9_17.

Lawlor, Leonard. Derrida and Husserl: The Basic Problem of Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002.

Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye, and Albert Riedlinger. Translated by Translated by Roy Harris. London: Duckworth, 1983.

Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa, ed. Logos of Phenomenology and Phenomenology of the Logos. Book One: Phenomenology As the Critique of Reason in Contemporary Criticism and Interpretation. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3680-9.

Copyright

© Forum Philosophicum