Anthony J. Carroll

Disenchantment, Rationality and the Modernity of Max Weber

Article
16/1 - Spring 2011, pages 117–137
Date of online publication: 24 mars 2011
Date of publication: 24 mars 2011

Abstract

Following Aristotle's distinction between theoretical and practical rationality, Max Weber holds that beliefs about the world and actions within the world must follow procedures consistently and be appropriately formed if they are to count as rational. Here, I argue that Weber's account of theoretical and practical rationality, as disclosed through his conception of the disenchantment of the world, displays a confessional architecture consistently structured by a nineteenth century German Protestant outlook. I develop this thesis through a review of the concepts of rationality and disenchantment in Weber's major works and conclude that this conceptual framework depicts a Protestant account of modernity.

Keywords

Cite this article

Carroll, Anthony J. “Disenchantment, Rationality and the Modernity of Max Weber.” Forum Philosophicum 16, no. 1 (2011): 117–137. doi:10.5840/forphil201116117.

Bibliography

Bendix, Reinhard. Max Weber and Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.

Bilimoria, Purushottama, and Andrew B. Irvine, eds. Postcolonial Philosophy of Religion. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.

Carroll, Anthony J. “Church and Culture. Protestant and Catholic Modernities.” New Blackfriars 90 (2009): 163–177.

Carroll, Anthony J. “The Importance of Protestantism in Max Weber’s Theory of Secularisation.” in European Journal of Sociology 50, no. 1 (2009): 61–95.

Congar, Yves. “R. Sohm nous interroge encore.” Revue de science philosophiques et théologique 57 (1973): 263–294.

Chalcraft, David J., and Austin Harrington, eds. The Protestant Ethic Debate. Translated by Austin Harrington, and Mary Shields. Liverpool, Liverpool University Press, 2001.

Dupré, Louis. “The Modern Idea of Culture: Its Opposition to Its Classical and Christian Roots.” In Modernity and Religion, edited by Ralph McInerney, 1–18. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.

Ebeling, Gerhard. Luther: An Introduction to his Thought. Translated by Richard Armstrong Wilson. London: Collins, 1972.

Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah.“Multipe Modernities.” Daedelus 129, no. 1 (2000): 1–29.

Elster, Jon. “Rationality, Economy, and Society.” In The Cambridge Companion to Weber, edited by Stephen Turner, 21–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm. “The German Theological Sources and Protestant Church Politics.” In Weber’s Protestant Ethic: Origins, Evidence, Contexts, edited by Hartmut Lehmann, and Roth Günther, 27–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Levine, Donald W. “The Continuing Challenge of Weber’s Theory of Rational Action” In Max Weber’s Economy and Society. A Critical Companion. edited by Charles C. Camic, Philip S. Gorski, and David M. Trubek, 101–126. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.

Radkau, Joachim. Max Weber. Die Leidenschaft des Denkens. München Wien: Hanser, 2005.

Schluchter, Wolfgang. Die Enstehung des modernen Rationalismus. Eine Analyse von Max Webers von Max Webers Entwicklungsgeschichte des Okzidents. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998.

Schluchter, Wolfgang. “Weber’s Sociology of Rationalism and Typology of Religious Rejections of the World.” In Max Weber, Rationality and Modenrity, edited by Scott Lash and Sam Whimster, 92–118. London: Allen and Unwin, 1987.

Sebott, Reinhold. Fundamentalkanonistik. Grund und Grenzen des Kirchenrechts. Frankfurt am Main: Knecht, 1993.

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self. The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Taylor, Charles. “Two Theories of Modernity.” Hastings Center Report 25, no. 2 (1995): 24–33.

Tenbruch, Friedrich. Das Werk Max Webers. Gesammelte Aufsätze zu Max Weber. Edited by Harald Homman, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.

Yack, Bernard. The Fetishism of Modernities. Epochal Self-Consciousness in Contemporary Social and Political Thought. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.

Voigt, Friedemann. “Das Protestantische Erbe in Max Webers Vorträgen über ‘Wissenschaft als Berfu’ und ‘Politik als Beruf’.” Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologie Geschichte 9, no. 2 (2002): 245–267.

Wißmann, Hans, Rudolf Smend, Benjamin Uffenheimer, et al.“ Eschatologie.” In Theologische Realenzyklopädie. Vol. 10: Erasmus—Fakultäten, Theologische, edited by Gerhard Krause and Gerhard Müller, 254–363. Berlin; New York: de Gluyter, 1982

Weber, Max. Das Antike Judentum. In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, 3 Vols., edited by Marianne Weber, 3: 1–400. Tübingen, Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1988.

Weber, Max. Die protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus. Edited and Introduced by Klaus Lichtblau and Johaness Weiss. Weinheim: Beltz Athenäum, 2000.

Weber, Max. Die Wirtschaftethik der Weltreligionen. In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, 3 Vols., edited by Marianne Weber, 1: 237–573. Tübingen, Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1988.

Weber, Max. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. 3 Vols. Edited by Marianne Weber. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1988.

Weber, Max. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Edited by Johannes Winckelmann. 7th Edition. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1988.

Weber, Max. Gesammelte Politische Schriften. Edited by Johannes Winckelmann. 5th Edition. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1988.

Weber, Max. Politik als Beruf. In Gesammelte Politische Schriften, edited by Johannes Winckelmann, 505–560. 5th Edition. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1988.

Weber, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Edition. Edited by Johannes Winckelmann. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck). 1972.

Weber, Max. Wissenschaft als Beruf. In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, edited by Johannes Winckelmann, 582–613. 7th Edition. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1988.

Weber, Max. Zwischenbetrachtung: Theorie der Stufen und Richtungen religiöser Weltablehnung. In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, 3 Vols, edited by Marianne Weber, 1: 536–573. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1988.

Copyright

© Forum Philosophicum