Simin Rahimi

Divine Command Theory in the Passage of History

Article
14/2 - Fall 2009, pages 307–328
Date of online publication: 15 novembre 2009
Date of publication: 01 novembre 2009

Abstract

Are actions that are morally good, morally goosd because God makes them so (e.g., by commanding them)? Or does God urge humans to do them because they are morally good anyway? What is, in general, the relationship between divine commands and ethical duties? It is not an uncommon belief among theists that morality depends entirely on the will or commands of God: all moral facts consist exclusively in facts about his will or commands. Thus, not only is an action right because it is commanded by God, but its conformity to his commands is what alone makes it right. An action is right (wrong) solely because he commands (forbids) it, and solely in virtue of his doing so. This view has come to be known as the „divine command theory of morality". This paper is devoted to a brief reconstruction of claims and controversies surrounding the theory, beginning with Plato's Euthyphro, which is the historical initiator of the debate and to a reconstruction of the various lines of argument that have been set forth to defend the theory.

Keywords

Cite this article

Rahimi, Simin. “Divine Command Theory in the Passage of History.” Forum Philosophicum 14, no. 2 (2009): 307–328. doi: 10.5840/forphil20091428.

Bibliography

Adams, Robert Merrihew. “Divine Command Metaethics Modified Again.” In The virtue of faith and other essays in philosophical theology, 128–143. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

Adams, Marilyn, “The Structure of Ockham’s Moral Theory.” Franciscan Studies 46 (1986): 1–35.

Brink, Gijsbert van den. Almighty God. A Study of the Doctrine of Divine Omnipotence. Kampen: Pharos, 1993.

Brown, John. “The logic of Euthyphro 10A–11B.” The Philosophical Quarterly, 14 (1964): 1–13.

Brunner, Emil. The Christian Doctrine of Creation and Redemption. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1952.

Chandler, John. “Divine Command Theories and the Appeal to Love.” American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (1985): 231–239.

Cobb, William S. “The Religious and the Just in Plato’s Euthyphro.” Ancient Philosophy 5 (1985): 41–46.

Cohen, S. Marc “Socrates on the Definition of Piety: Euthyphro 10A–11B.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1971): 1–13.

Cudworth, Ralph. “A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality.” In Divine Commands and Morality: Historical and contemporary readings, edited by Janine Marie Idziak, 155–171. New York, Mellen, 1979.

Copleston Frederick C. A History of Philosophy. Vol. 3, Late Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy, bk. 1, Ockham to the Speculative Mystics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Image Book, 1963.

Davidson, Matthew. “A Demonstration Against Theistic Activism.” Religious Studies 35 91999): 277–290.

Davis, Stephen. Logic and the Nature of God. London: Macmillan, 1983.

Davison, Scott. “Could Abstract Objects Depend Upon God?” Religious Studies 27 (1991): 485–497.

Descartes, René. Philosophical Letters of Descartes. Edited by Anthony Kenny. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.

Ewing, Alfred. “The Autonomy of Ethics.” In Divine Commands and Morality: Historical and contemporary readings, edited by Janine Marie Idziak, 224–230. New York, Mellen, 1979.

Geach, Peter. “Plato’s Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary.” Monist 50 (1966): 369–382.

Geach, Peter. “Omnipotence.” Philosophy 43 (1973): 7–20.

Hoerber, G. Robert. “Plato’s Euthyphro.” Phronesis 3 (1958): 95–107.

Hourani, George F. Reason and tradition in Islamic Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

Hourani, George F. Islamic Rationalism, The Ethics of ‘Abd al-Jabbar. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.

Idziak, Janine Marie, ed. Divine Commands and Morality: Historical and contemporary readings. New York, Mellen, 1979.

Jowett, Benjamin. The Works of Plato. New York: Tudor, n.d.

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Translated by Herbert James Paton. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.

Maimonides, Moses. The Guide of the Perplexed. Translated by Sholomo Pines. The University of Chicago Press, 1963.

McCarthy, Richard J., ed. The Theology of al-Asha‘ari. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1953.

Morris, Thomas V., and Christopher Menzel. “Absolute Creation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 23, no. 4 (1986): 353–362.

Plantinga, Alvin. Does God have a Nature? Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980.

Plato. Plato, Defence of Socrates, Euthyphro, Crito. Translated with an Introduction by David Gallop, Oxford University Press, 1997.

Pluzanski de Radwan, Emile Claude Armand. Essai Sur La Philosophie de Duns Scot. Paris: Thorin, 1888.

Price, Richard. A review of the Principal Questions in Morals. 3rd edition. New York: Franklin, 1974.

Quinn, Philip L. “The Primacy of God’s Will in Christian Ethics.” In Philosophical Perspectives, 6: Ethics, edited by James E. Tomberlin, 493–513. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview, 1992.

Sagi, Avi, and Daniel Statman. Religion and Morality. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995.

Sharvy, Richard, ‘Euthyphro 9d-11b: Analysis and Definition in Plato and Others.” Noûs 6, no. 2 (1972): 119–137.

Stump, Eleonore. “A review of Plantinga, Does God have a nature?” The Thomist 47 (1983): 617–620.

Sullivan, Stephen. “Why Adams Need to Modify his Divine Command Theory One More Time.” Faith and Philosophy 11, no. 1 (1994): 72–81.

Taylor, A. E. Plato the Man and His Work. London: Metheun, 1949.

Taylor, C. C. W. “The End of the Euthyphro.” Phronesis 27, no. 1 (1982): 109–118.

Tomberlin, James E., ed. Philosophical Perspectives, 6: Ethics. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview, 1992.

Urban, Linwood. “William of Ockham’s Theological Ethics.” Franciscan Studies 33 (1973): 310–350.

Westmoreland, Robert. “Two Recent Metaphysical Divine Command Theories of Ethics.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39, no. 1 (1996): 15–31.

Copyright

© Forum Philosophicum