Francis Jonbäck

How to Be a Very Friendly Atheist Indeed

Article
20/1 - Spring 2015, pages 65–72
Date of online publication: 12 janvier 2016
Date of publication: 12 janvier 2016

Abstract

Friendly atheists hold atheism to be true, and believe that theists may be rational when holding theism to be true. Theists may be rational, they claim, either because they lack the evidence for atheism, or because they are mistaken regarding the evidential force of the arguments for theism. Both these reasons can be interpreted as suggesting that theists are making a mistake, and perhaps even that they are blameworthy for having made that mistake. In this paper, I argue that friendly atheists might even say that the most intellectually oriented theists are rational and blameless for holding theism to be true. I give two reasons for this. The first reason is based on the denial of doxastic voluntarism regarding at least some of our beliefs. Theists might not have voluntary control with respect to their belief that God exists. The second reason is based on a meta-epistemological consideration. Often, we choose our epistemology by looking at paradigm examples of knowledge. Growing up in a theistic context might lead one to regard the belief that God exists as a paradigm example of knowledge, and a theist could be considered perfectly rational and blameless for doing so, even though they may be aware of reasonable arguments for atheism. With these modifications, I suggest that Friendly Atheism is very friendly indeed.

Keywords

Bibliography

Aikin, Scott F. “Modest Evidentialism.” International Philosophical Quarterly 46, no. 3 (2006): 327–43. doi:10.5840/ipq200646319.

Chisholm, Rodrick. Theory of Knowledge. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall Foundations of Philosophy Series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989.

Feldman, Richard, and Earl Conee. “Evidentialism.” Philosophical Studies 48, no. 1 (1985): 15–34. doi:10.1007/BF00372404.

Fumerton, Richard. “Epistemic Toleration and New Atheism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37, no.1 (2013): 97–108. doi:10.1111/misp.12001.

Fumerton, Richard. “The Problem of Criterion.” In The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, edited by John Greco, 34–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Plantinga, Alvin. “Theism, Atheism and Rationality.” Truth Journal 3, (1991). Accessed 10 October 2013. http://www.leaderu.com/truth/3truth02.html.

Rowe, William L. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” International Philosophical Quarterly 16, no. 4 (1979): 335–41. doi:10.2307/20009775.

Copyright

© Forum Philosophicum